WebMuch reliance was placed upon the observations of Lord Diplock in Garland v British Rail Engineering Ltd Case 12/81 [1982] 2 All ER 402 at 415, [1983] 2 AC 751 at 771 when … Web12/81 Garland vBritish Rail Engineering1982 ECR359[, paragraph] 5, andCase C-262/88 Barber 1990 [ ECR]I-1889, paragraph12 ). 24 The Courthas also held thatthefact thatcertainbenefitsare paidafter the termina tionofthe employment relationshipdoes notpreventthem frombeing thein natureofpay, withinthemeaning of 119Articleofthe …
Judgment of the Court of 9 February 1982 in Case 12/81 (referenc…
Webequal pay issue by citing Eileen Garland v British Rail Engineering Limited (12/81) [1982] ECR 359 o Case which concerned travel concessions being considered ‘pay’ – they were. o R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith (Case C-167/97) [1999] ECR I-623 Payment linked to employment is considered pay. WebEileen Garland v British Rail Engineering Limited. Reference for a preliminary ruling: House of Lords - United Kingdom. Equal pay for men and women. Case 12/81. … bond dmv
EUR-Lex - 61993CJ0342 - EN - EUR-Lex
WebOn 25 November 1976 Mrs Garland complained to an industrial tribunal that British Rail Engineering was discrimi nating against her contrary to the provisions of the Sex … WebThe case Garland v BREL 20 stated that even benefits received by retired employees who had ended their contract of employment, can fall under Article 157 TFEU. The warm clothing allowance is probably mentioned in the male tractor drivers’ contracts of employment but it is not included in the female drivers’ contracts. Web1. Mrs. Eileen Mary Garland is a married woman employed by the respondents, British Rail Engineering Ltd. (BREL). The whole of the shareholding in BREL. is held by the British … bond docs